BONDA VARALAKSHMI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/867/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010111152026

Filing Number

CRMP/4726/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/867/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BONDA VARALAKSHMI

    Adv. P. Acharya,JUHI JAISWAL,JUHI JAISWAL, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,JUHI JAISWAL

  2. 2.Roopesh Bonda,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Smt Bhavani Bonda,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay of criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute case. The petitioners (mother-in-law and son) sought quashment of an FIR registered for cruelty allegations under Section 85 BNS 2023, filed by the son's wife, arguing the charges were vague, unsubstantiated, and motivated by malice with intent to extort Rs. 50 lakhs. The court stayed further proceedings on the charge sheet till the next hearing, finding merit in the petitioners' submissions regarding contradictions and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay of criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute case. The petitioners (mother-in-law and son) sought quashment of an FIR registered for cruelty allegations under Section 85 BNS 2023, filed by the son's wife, arguing the charges were vague, unsubstantiated, and motivated by malice with intent to extort Rs. 50 lakhs. The court stayed further proceedings on the charge sheet till the next hearing, finding merit in the petitioners' submissions regarding contradictions and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case