AASMAN KASHYAP vs SMT. DINAMANI KASHYAP — CRR/437/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010110042026

Filing Number

CRR/4707/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/437/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AASMAN KASHYAP

    Adv. ADITI JOSHI,MADHUNISHA SINGH,MADHUNISHA SINGH, ,DYNA BAJRANG,DYNA BAJRANG,ASHISH GANGWANI,SAJAL KUMAR GUPTA,PANKAJ SINGH,MADHUNISHA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. DINAMANI KASHYAP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the husband's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order. The High Court upheld the Family Court's finding that the marriage was validly established through oral testimony, witness accounts, and marriage certificate; that the wife was residing separately with sufficient cause due to harassment and ill-treatment; and that she was entitled to Rs. 3,000 per month maintenance, considering both parties' financial positions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/437/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the husband's criminal revision challenging the Family Court's maintenance order. The High Court upheld the Family Court's finding that the marriage was validly established through oral testimony, witness accounts, and marriage certificate; that the wife was residing separately with sufficient cause due to harassment and ill-treatment; and that she was entitled to Rs. 3,000 per month maintenance, considering both parties' financial positions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case