RAJKUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/452/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010109992026

Filing Number

MCRCA/4702/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/452/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR SAHU

    Adv. Pragalbha Sharma,ALOK KUMAR DUBEY,ALOK KUMAR DUBEY, ,LAXMI GUPTA,LAXMI GUPTA,ALOK KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajkumar Sahu in a stock market fraud case where he was accused based solely on a co-accused's memorandum and was not named in the original FIR. The court relied on the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail and imposed standard conditions including personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Rajkumar Sahu in a stock market fraud case where he was accused based solely on a co-accused's memorandum and was not named in the original FIR. The court relied on the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail and imposed standard conditions including personal bond, non-interference with witnesses, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case