ABHISHEKH SHARMA vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/753/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010109892026
Filing Number
CRA/4692/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRA/753/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
ADHINIYAM, 1990.MATTERS RELATING TO SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989;UNTOUCHABILITY (OFFENCES) AMENDMENT & MISC. PROVISION ACT, 1976. ( 1419 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEKH SHARMA
Adv. RAJKUMAR PALI,Amit Kumar Sahu,Amit Kumar Sahu, ,PRATIBHA SAHU,Amit Kumar Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the bail appeal of Abhishek Sharma, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting a Schedule Caste victim following a road accident. The court found sufficient evidence against the appellant, including his alleged involvement in grabbing the victim and his prior criminal records, and determined that bail was inappropriate given the serious nature of the SCST Act offences and the trial's early stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/753/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the bail appeal of Abhishek Sharma, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting a Schedule Caste victim following a road accident. The court found sufficient evidence against the appellant, including his alleged involvement in grabbing the victim and his prior criminal records, and determined that bail was inappropriate given the serious nature of the SCST Act offences and the trial's early stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts