JUVENILE IN CONFLICT WITH LAW vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRR/412/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010109862026

Filing Number

CRR/4689/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/412/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS UNDER JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT, 2000. ( 1425 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUVENILE IN CONFLICT WITH LAW

    Adv. SHUBHANK TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed bail applications filed by two juveniles accused of robbery, assault, and wrongful restraint under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The court found reasonable grounds to deny bail, citing the gravity of the offences, the juveniles' apparent prior involvement in similar criminal activity in November 2025, and concerns that release would expose them to moral/psychological danger and defeat the ends of justice under Section 12 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed bail applications filed by two juveniles accused of robbery, assault, and wrongful restraint under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The court found reasonable grounds to deny bail, citing the gravity of the offences, the juveniles' apparent prior involvement in similar criminal activity in November 2025, and concerns that release would expose them to moral/psychological danger and defeat the ends of justice under Section 12 of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case