PARAS RAM CHANDRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2656/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010109492026

Filing Number

WPS/6285/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/2656/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAS RAM CHANDRAKAR

    Adv. KESHAV DEWANGAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN, ,AKASH PANDEY,HARSHAL CHOUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Paras Ram Chandrakar, a Patwari challenging his transfer order, by permitting him to submit a detailed representation before the Collector of Dhamtari raising all grounds available to him. The court directed the Collector to consider and decide the representation expeditiously within three weeks, with the State respondent agreeing to the petitioner's limited prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2656/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Paras Ram Chandrakar, a Patwari challenging his transfer order, by permitting him to submit a detailed representation before the Collector of Dhamtari raising all grounds available to him. The court directed the Collector to consider and decide the representation expeditiously within three weeks, with the State respondent agreeing to the petitioner's limited prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case