PRAKASH SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2638/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010109402026

Filing Number

WPS/6281/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/2638/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH SAHU

    Adv. KESHAV DEWANGAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN, ,AKASH PANDEY,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR,HARSHAL CHOUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector,

  3. 3.The Sub Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Prakash Sahu's writ petition challenging his transfer order as a Patwari, permitting him to file a comprehensive representation before the District Collector raising all grounds of grievance. The Court directed the Collector to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within three weeks, with the State offering no objection to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2638/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Prakash Sahu's writ petition challenging his transfer order as a Patwari, permitting him to file a comprehensive representation before the District Collector raising all grounds of grievance. The Court directed the Collector to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within three weeks, with the State offering no objection to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case