M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1323/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010108592026

Filing Number

WPC/6239/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1323/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

CONTRACT ACT. ( 2103 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTION

    Adv. HARISH KHUNTIYA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, ,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Engineering-In-Chief

  3. 3.The Mission Director,

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer and Member Secretary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition by Gayatri Construction seeking release of 30% pending payment for completed water supply work under the Jal Jeevan Mission scheme. The court held that contractual payment disputes involving factual determinations about work completion, measurements, and verification fall outside writ jurisdiction and require civil remedies, as judicial review in tender matters must be exercised with restraint only in cases of clear arbitrariness, which was not demonstrated here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition by Gayatri Construction seeking release of 30% pending payment for completed water supply work under the Jal Jeevan Mission scheme. The court held that contractual payment disputes involving factual determinations about work completion, measurements, and verification fall outside writ jurisdiction and require civil remedies, as judicial review in tender matters must be exercised with restraint only in cases of clear arbitrariness, which was not demonstrated here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case