MOHIT SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,VIRENDRA KASHYAP — MCRCA/426/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010108352026

Filing Number

MCRCA/4610/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/426/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHIT SAHU

    Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI, ,RUPESH SAHU,RUPESH SAHU,NARENDRA MEHAR,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINHA,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,VIRENDRA KASHYAP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohit Sahu in a case involving allegations of assault and threats against his live-in partner. The court allowed the application, noting the complainant's written statement expressing no objection to bail and her unwillingness to pursue the matter further, combined with no objections from the objector's counsel. Bail was granted with conditions including a personal bond, surety, non-interference with witnesses, court attendance, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohit Sahu in a case involving allegations of assault and threats against his live-in partner. The court allowed the application, noting the complainant's written statement expressing no objection to bail and her unwillingness to pursue the matter further, combined with no objections from the objector's counsel. Bail was granted with conditions including a personal bond, surety, non-interference with witnesses, court attendance, and prohibition from committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case