GRAM PANCHAYAT HATHBAND vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1215/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010107452026
Filing Number
WPC/6168/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/1215/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GRAM PANCHAYAT HATHBAND
Adv. UJJWAL CHOUBEY,VAIBHAV SHUKLA,VAIBHAV SHUKLA, ,Chandradeep Prasad,ASTHA SHARMA,VAIBHAV SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.COLLECTOR
-
3.CEO ZILA PANCHAYAT
-
4.CEO, JANPAD PANCHAYAT SIMGA
Adv. SOUMITRA KESHARWANI
-
5.VINOD DAS VAISHNAV
-
6.HEERALAL YADAV
-
7.GRAM PANCHAYAT RINGANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging the transfer orders of Panchayat Secretaries, finding that Vinod Das Vaishnav's transfer was based on complaints from villagers and that Heeralal Yadav's appointment as the new secretary was justified. However, the court observed that frequent transfers without justifiable reasons should be avoided to prevent disruption of welfare schemes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1215/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging the transfer orders of Panchayat Secretaries, finding that Vinod Das Vaishnav's transfer was based on complaints from villagers and that Heeralal Yadav's appointment as the new secretary was justified. However, the court observed that frequent transfers without justifiable reasons should be avoided to prevent disruption of welfare schemes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts