TILAKRAM JATWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2498/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010106632022

Filing Number

WPS/5864/2022

Filing Date

25-Mar-2022

Registration No

WPS/2498/2022

Registration Date

06-Apr-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TILAKRAM JATWAR

    Adv. G.V.KUTUMBA RAO,SYED MAJID ALI,SYED MAJID ALI, ,JEET RAM PATEL,PRABHU LAL,Himanshu Sinha,Qamrul Aziz,Qamrul Aziz,SYED MAJID ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Collector

  4. 4.District Education Officer

  5. 5.District Treasury Officer

  6. 6.Block Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed the writ petition filed by Tilakram Jatwar, a government school peon, as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jun-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  4. 11-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 11-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2498/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed the writ petition filed by Tilakram Jatwar, a government school peon, as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time. The court did not adjudicate the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case