TELSINGH RATHIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2791/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010106612026

Filing Number

MCRC/4558/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2791/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TELSINGH RATHIYA

    Adv. Prahalad Panda,KAILASH KUMAR GUPTA,KAILASH KUMAR GUPTA, ,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Telsingh Rathiya, accused of killing Samundar Rathiya with an axe in August 2021, finding eyewitness testimony and medical evidence of homicide supported the prosecution case. However, recognizing his prolonged custody since August 2021 with only 3 of 20 witnesses examined, the court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within 5 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2791/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected bail for Telsingh Rathiya, accused of killing Samundar Rathiya with an axe in August 2021, finding eyewitness testimony and medical evidence of homicide supported the prosecution case. However, recognizing his prolonged custody since August 2021 with only 3 of 20 witnesses examined, the court directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within 5 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case