Nurtan Majhi MOHAMMAD AFROZ ATHAR, ,PURNCHAND,Chandradeep Prasad vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2488/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010106352026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

MCRC/4544/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2488/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nurtan Majhi MOHAMMAD AFROZ ATHAR, ,PURNCHAND,Chandradeep Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/2488/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Nurtan Majhi, arrested for illegal liquor possession under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court found that despite 70 liters of Mahua liquor being seized, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet was filed, and prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified. Conditions: Bail was granted with personal bond and two sureties, imposing strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2488/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/2488/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Nurtan Majhi, arrested for illegal liquor possession under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court found that despite 70 liters of Mahua liquor being seized, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet was filed, and prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified. Conditions: Bail was granted with personal bond and two sureties, imposing strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case