BHUSHAN LAL SAHU ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,MOHAMMAD NAQEEB vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/406/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010105992026

Filing Number

WA/6070/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/406/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUSHAN LAL SAHU ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,MOHAMMAD NAQEEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commissioner

  3. 3.Principal

  4. 4.The Joint Director Treasury

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary of WA 406/2026 — High Court of Chhattisgarh Case: Bhushan Lal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh Decision: The High Court dismissed the appellant's writ appeal, upholding the Single Judge's order denying credit for ad hoc service (1991-1996) toward pension calculations. The court held that under Rule 15-A of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, ad hoc service qualifies for pension only if regularized without interruption; since breaks existed between fixed-period tenures, the pension authority correctly calculated benefits from the regularization date (12.08.1996) onward. No illegality warranted appellate intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/406/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WA 406/2026 — High Court of Chhattisgarh Case: Bhushan Lal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh Decision: The High Court dismissed the appellant's writ appeal, upholding the Single Judge's order denying credit for ad hoc service (1991-1996) toward pension calculations. The court held that under Rule 15-A of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, ad hoc service qualifies for pension only if regularized without interruption; since breaks existed between fixed-period tenures, the pension authority correctly calculated benefits from the regularization date (12.08.1996) onward. No illegality warranted appellate intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case