KARAN @ KARN KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — MCRC/2665/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010105222026
Filing Number
MCRC/4490/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2665/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
POCSO Act ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARAN @ KARN KUMAR SAHU
Adv. S.P. SAHU,Pradeep Kumar Singh,Pradeep Kumar Singh, ,Pradeep Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Karan Kumar Sahu, arrested for outraging the modesty of a 12-13-year-old girl under BNS Section 74 and POCSO Act Section 8. The court approved the bail application considering the victim and her father's "no objection," their hostile testimony, prolonged trial duration, and the applicant's detention since October 15, 2025. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one solvent surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2665/2026
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Karan Kumar Sahu, arrested for outraging the modesty of a 12-13-year-old girl under BNS Section 74 and POCSO Act Section 8. The court approved the bail application considering the victim and her father's "no objection," their hostile testimony, prolonged trial duration, and the applicant's detention since October 15, 2025. He was released on a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one solvent surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts