RAVISHANKAR SINGH THAKUR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRR/444/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010105192026

Filing Number

CRR/4488/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/444/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AGAINST THE FRAMING OF CHARGE. ( 1422 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVISHANKAR SINGH THAKUR

    Adv. JITENDRA GUPTA,PALASH PRAKASH RAJANI,PALASH PRAKASH RAJANI, ,PALASH PRAKASH RAJANI,PALASH PRAKASH RAJANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.XYZ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravishankar Singh Thakur, upholding the charge framed under Section 69 of BNS, 2023 for allegedly inducing a woman into a physical relationship on pretext of marriage. The court held that at the charge-framing stage, prima facie material suffices and the accused's defense cannot be examined; such defenses must be tested during trial through examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/444/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravishankar Singh Thakur, upholding the charge framed under Section 69 of BNS, 2023 for allegedly inducing a woman into a physical relationship on pretext of marriage. The court held that at the charge-framing stage, prima facie material suffices and the accused's defense cannot be examined; such defenses must be tested during trial through examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case