AJAY KUMAR NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/846/2026
Status: For Orders [On Office Notes]. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010104162026
Filing Number
CRA/4445/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRA/846/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO POCSO ACT ( 1441 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJAY KUMAR NISHAD
Adv. BHASKAR PAYASHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The appeal filed by Ajay Kumar Nishad was admitted after the Court condoned the 25-day delay in filing, treating it as a statutory right that should not be defeated on technical grounds. The State has been directed to file its reply to the bail application (I.A. No.01) within two weeks and inform the victim's mother of the appeal's pendency. The matter is listed for further consideration of the suspension of sentence and bail application after the lower court record is summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/846/2026
The appeal filed by Ajay Kumar Nishad was admitted after the Court condoned the 25-day delay in filing, treating it as a statutory right that should not be defeated on technical grounds. The State has been directed to file its reply to the bail application (I.A. No.01) within two weeks and inform the victim's mother of the appeal's pendency. The matter is listed for further consideration of the suspension of sentence and bail application after the lower court record is summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts