MOHAMMAD SHAHID CHAUHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRR/427/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010103532026

Filing Number

CRR/4437/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRR/427/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL REVISIONS AGAINST THE FRAMING OF CHARGE. ( 1422 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD SHAHID CHAUHAN

    Adv. PAWAN KESHARWANI,ADITI DIWAN,ADITI DIWAN, ,ADITI DIWAN

  2. 2.ANASH CHAUHAN

  3. 3.SHAHNAWAZ

  4. 4.MUSTAFA RAZA

  5. 5.MUZZAMIL KHAN

  6. 6.MD. ISHAQ CHAUHAN

  7. 7.MD. SHADIK CHAUHAN

  8. 8.MD. WASIM CHAUHAN

  9. 9.MD. HAMEED

  10. 10.MD. RASHID CHAUHAN

  11. 11.MD. ZAFAR CHAUHAN

  12. 12.MD. VAKIL CHAUHAN

  13. 13.MD. JAMIL CHAUHAN

  14. 14.IRFAN BHATHI

  15. 15.MD. SHAFIQ CHAUHAN

  16. 16.MD. SADDAB CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing in CRR No. 427 of 2026 (Mohammad Shahid Chauhan v. State of Chhattisgarh) on an application for condonation of delay. The applicant was granted time to file a fresh application specifying the number of days of delay, as this detail was missing from the original application. The case is listed for hearing again after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing in CRR No. 427 of 2026 (Mohammad Shahid Chauhan v. State of Chhattisgarh) on an application for condonation of delay. The applicant was granted time to file a fresh application specifying the number of days of delay, as this detail was missing from the original application. The case is listed for hearing again after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case