OMPRAKASH RATRE vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPC/1417/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010103522026

Filing Number

WPC/5916/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1417/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OMPRAKASH RATRE

    Adv. DHIRAJ KUMAR WANKHEDE,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN, ,SANCHIT BHATT,ANIRUDDH SINGH,ANIRUDDH SINGH,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN,SAMYAK SINGHAI JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Reserve Bank of India

  4. 4.The Office of Banking Ombudsman

  5. 5.ICICI Bank Limited

  6. 6.Paysense Services India Private Limited

  7. 7.Yes Bank Limited

  8. 8.Collector

  9. 9.Spash Advisor Private Limited

  10. 10.RV Group

  11. 11.Abhay Gupta

  12. 12.Pooja Yadav

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Status Summary: The petition was adjourned for two weeks. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to all respondents and granted interim protection to the petitioner (a government teacher) by restraining the respondent banks from taking any coercive recovery action against him. The petitioner alleged that direct selling agents of ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, and others fraudulently obtained multiple personal loans (Rs. 30.01 lakhs) in his name without consent, and after stopping EMI payments, banks' recovery agents began harassment. Respondents were given two weeks to file their reply, with the case listed for next hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: The petition was adjourned for two weeks. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to all respondents and granted interim protection to the petitioner (a government teacher) by restraining the respondent banks from taking any coercive recovery action against him. The petitioner alleged that direct selling agents of ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, and others fraudulently obtained multiple personal loans (Rs. 30.01 lakhs) in his name without consent, and after stopping EMI payments, banks' recovery agents began harassment. Respondents were given two weeks to file their reply, with the case listed for next hearing thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case