RAJENDRA RAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1429/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010102812026

Filing Number

WPC/5891/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1429/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA RAI

    Adv. PRABHAT KUMAR SAXENA,AMIYAKANT TIWARI,AMIYAKANT TIWARI, ,GALIB DWIVEDI,ANIL TAWADKAR,AMIYAKANT TIWARI

  2. 2.Ashish Banerjee

  3. 3.Rekhlal Thakur

  4. 4.Chitta Ranjan Parida

  5. 5.Premkumar Ojha

  6. 6.Jyotish Kumar Soni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.The Commissioner

    Adv. PANKAJ AGRAWAL,SWATI AGRAWAL AASHA NIRMALKAR

  4. 4.The Sub Division Officer (Revenue) Raigarh,

  5. 5.The Deputy Director

  6. 6.The Assistant Director

  7. 7.The Deputy Registrar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Adjourned In WPC No. 1429 of 2026 (Rajendra Rai vs. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur found the case listed on default due to lack of representation for the petitioner. The court granted one week's time to the petitioner's counsel to cure the default, with the case to be heard thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned In WPC No. 1429 of 2026 (Rajendra Rai vs. State of Chhattisgarh), the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur found the case listed on default due to lack of representation for the petitioner. The court granted one week's time to the petitioner's counsel to cure the default, with the case to be heard thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case