VINOD KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2439/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010102012026

Filing Number

MCRC/4361/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2439/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR SAHU,DEEPAK KUMAR NISHAD,DEEPAK KUMAR NISHAD, ,ANIL KUMAR SAHU,DEEPAK KUMAR NISHAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vinod Kumar Sahu, accused of luring away a minor girl under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(e) of BNS 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act. The court considered that the victim and her father recorded no objection to bail, only one of eighteen witnesses was examined, trial would take considerable time, and the applicant had been in jail since December 12, 2025. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vinod Kumar Sahu, accused of luring away a minor girl under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(e) of BNS 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act. The court considered that the victim and her father recorded no objection to bail, only one of eighteen witnesses was examined, trial would take considerable time, and the applicant had been in jail since December 12, 2025. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case