PRASHANT KURRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2909/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010101322022

Filing Number

WPS/5578/2022

Filing Date

22-Mar-2022

Registration No

WPS/2909/2022

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRASHANT KURRE

    Adv. VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Dy-Director

  4. 4.Dy-Director

  5. 5.Shubhendra Singh Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Prashant Kurre's writ petition (WPS No. 2909 of 2022) challenging the appointment of respondent no. 5 as Assistant Veterinary Field Officer, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time. The court found no objection from the opposing party and proceeded to dismiss the petition on this ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 12-May-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  5. 27-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  6. 27-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2909/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Prashant Kurre's writ petition (WPS No. 2909 of 2022) challenging the appointment of respondent no. 5 as Assistant Veterinary Field Officer, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time. The court found no objection from the opposing party and proceeded to dismiss the petition on this ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case