VASUDEO KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2254/2021
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010101202021
Filing Number
WPS/5828/2021
Filing Date
31-Mar-2021
Registration No
WPS/2254/2021
Registration Date
01-Apr-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASUDEO KUMAR PRADHAN
Adv. DHANI RAM PATEL,SANJAY PATEL,SANJAY PATEL, ,SANJAY PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Secretary,
-
3.Director,
-
4.Chief Executive Officer,
Adv. VEDANT SHADANGI
-
5.District Education Officer,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the Director's order dated 27.11.2020 rejecting the petitioner's representation for cadre change from "T" to "E" cadre, finding it was passed mechanically without proper consideration of the petitioner's actual claim (instead erroneously addressing another person's claim). The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation, which must be reconsidered by the Director in light of the Supreme Court's judgment in Union Public Service Commission v. Bibhu Prasad Sarangi (2021) 4 SCC 516. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
28-Jun-2021
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
06-Apr-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
06-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/2254/2021
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the Director's order dated 27.11.2020 rejecting the petitioner's representation for cadre change from "T" to "E" cadre, finding it was passed mechanically without proper consideration of the petitioner's actual claim (instead erroneously addressing another person's claim). The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation, which must be reconsidered by the Director in light of the Supreme Court's judgment in Union Public Service Commission v. Bibhu Prasad Sarangi (2021) 4 SCC 516. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts