SMT. DURGAWATI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/304/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010101002026

Filing Number

WA/5781/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/304/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. DURGAWATI YADAV

    Adv. AJAY THAKRE,MANISH UPADHYAY,MANISH UPADHYAY, ,ABHINAV TIWARI,MANISH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

  3. 3.JOINT DIRECTOR

  4. 4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

  5. 5.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER

  6. 6.THE PRINCIPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WA 304/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed retired Assistant Teacher Smt. Durgawati Yadav's appeal challenging a Single Judge's order of 28.11.2025. The court rejected her application seeking condonation of a 55-day delay in filing the appeal, finding insufficient explanation for the inordinate delay. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held the appeal barred by limitation and laches, rendering it non-maintainable without consideration of merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA 304/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed retired Assistant Teacher Smt. Durgawati Yadav's appeal challenging a Single Judge's order of 28.11.2025. The court rejected her application seeking condonation of a 55-day delay in filing the appeal, finding insufficient explanation for the inordinate delay. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held the appeal barred by limitation and laches, rendering it non-maintainable without consideration of merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case