HEM BAI vs SMT. ANUSUIYA BAI Advocate - GOUTAM KHETRAPAL — WA/318/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010099212026

Filing Number

WA/5666/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/318/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

REVIEW PETITON ( 1736 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEM BAI

    Adv. Anushree Rajput,AMIT KUMAR VERMA,AMIT KUMAR VERMA, ,Akash Kumar Kundu,PRIYANKA SHUKLA,SHALINI GERA,SUDHA BHARDWAJ,Deepali Gupta,DIWESH KUMAR,AMIT KUMAR VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ANUSUIYA BAI Advocate - GOUTAM KHETRAPAL

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.Project Officer

  5. 5.Commissioner

  6. 6.Collector Kabirdham

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WA 318/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hem Bai's writ appeal challenging prior orders that had allowed Smt. Anusuiya Bai's writ petition. The court rejected Hem Bai's plea for condonation of a 577-day delay in filing the appeal, finding insufficient cause—her explanations were vague and general without specific justification for the prolonged inaction. Applying Supreme Court precedents on limitation periods, the court held that while a liberal approach may be adopted where bona fide explanations exist, delay cannot be condoned without satisfactory reasoning, particularly when affecting third parties' settled rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/318/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WA 318/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Hem Bai's writ appeal challenging prior orders that had allowed Smt. Anusuiya Bai's writ petition. The court rejected Hem Bai's plea for condonation of a 577-day delay in filing the appeal, finding insufficient cause—her explanations were vague and general without specific justification for the prolonged inaction. Applying Supreme Court precedents on limitation periods, the court held that while a liberal approach may be adopted where bona fide explanations exist, delay cannot be condoned without satisfactory reasoning, particularly when affecting third parties' settled rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case