AMAN RAMTEKE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/865/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010098292026

Filing Number

CRR/4231/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/865/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAN RAMTEKE

    Adv. HEMANT GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea seeking re-cross-examination of prosecution witness Ashutosh Kaushik under Section 348 BNSS. The court held that the defence counsel was already given adequate opportunity to cross-examine the witness at length, and allowing repeated recall merely due to alleged deficiency in cross-examination would cause undue hardship to witnesses and disrupt judicial proceedings, citing Supreme Court precedent in State v. Shiv Kumar Yadav. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/865/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea seeking re-cross-examination of prosecution witness Ashutosh Kaushik under Section 348 BNSS. The court held that the defence counsel was already given adequate opportunity to cross-examine the witness at length, and allowing repeated recall merely due to alleged deficiency in cross-examination would cause undue hardship to witnesses and disrupt judicial proceedings, citing Supreme Court precedent in State v. Shiv Kumar Yadav. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case