CHAND BABU @ CHAND MOHAMMAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2391/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010098072026

Filing Number

MCRC/4210/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2391/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAND BABU @ CHAND MOHAMMAD

    Adv. Anmol Sharma,Juhi Pandey,Juhi Pandey, ,Juhi Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Chand Babu in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 5,12,900 illegally transferred from a victim's bank account. The court found that the stolen amount was not transferred to the applicant's account, he was implicated mainly on co-accused statements without direct evidence, and similarly situated co-accused had already received bail, warranting parity. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Chand Babu in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 5,12,900 illegally transferred from a victim's bank account. The court found that the stolen amount was not transferred to the applicant's account, he was implicated mainly on co-accused statements without direct evidence, and similarly situated co-accused had already received bail, warranting parity. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case