Bharat Aluminium Company Limited , ,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,Sharad Mishra vs Parshuram Latiyar Advocate - A.G., ,S.P.KALE,LAV SHARMA,Bhupendra Kumar Pandey,ABHISHEK SINGH — WPL/165/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Sep-2017

CNR: CGHC010097852017

Filing Number

WPL/19227/2017

Filing Date

25-Jul-2017

Registration No

WPL/165/2017

Registration Date

29-Jul-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LABOUR MATTERS ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO PAYMENT OF GRATUITY. ( 111 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Aluminium Company Limited , ,SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,Sharad Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parshuram Latiyar Advocate - A.G., ,S.P.KALE,LAV SHARMA,Bhupendra Kumar Pandey,ABHISHEK SINGH

  2. 2.Labour Court Under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: WPL 165/2017 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Bharat Aluminium Company's petition challenging a Labour Court order, holding that since the Labour Court had already framed issues and the workman had adduced evidence with the petitioner's evidence scheduled for June 5, 2026, it was premature to decide whether the respondent qualified as a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court reserved the petitioner's right to raise all legal grounds before the Labour Court and directed expeditious conclusion of proceedings. The interim order was vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 02-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2022

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  7. 21-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  8. 30-Jan-2018

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

  9. 12-Oct-2017

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF

  10. 22-Sep-2017

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

  11. 06-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 02-Aug-2017

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF

  13. 25-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPL/165/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPL 165/2017 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Bharat Aluminium Company's petition challenging a Labour Court order, holding that since the Labour Court had already framed issues and the workman had adduced evidence with the petitioner's evidence scheduled for June 5, 2026, it was premature to decide whether the respondent qualified as a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court reserved the petitioner's right to raise all legal grounds before the Labour Court and directed expeditious conclusion of proceedings. The interim order was vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case