Naresh Chandravanshi (Died) Through Legal Heirs-(Legal Heir) vs (A) (Died And Deleted) Narayan Prasad Shukla Advocate - A.G., ,ANURAG BAJPAI,DHARMESH SRIVASTAVA 1. — SA/396/2017

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Sep-2017

CNR: CGHC010096872017

Filing Number

SA/16007/2017

Filing Date

23-Jun-2017

Registration No

SA/396/2017

Registration Date

28-Jun-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION ( 1717 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naresh Chandravanshi (Died) Through Legal Heirs-(Legal Heir)

    Adv. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,Dashrath Kushwaha,Umesh Pandey,Nand Kumari Kashyap,SAMPURNANK GUPTA,MANDWI BHARADWAJ,Sanjay Kumar Dewangan,PAWAN K. KASHYAP1.

  2. 2.A(

  3. 3.Padma Chandravanshi1.

  4. 4.A(

  5. 5.Dr. Swati Chandravanshi1.

  6. 6.A(

  7. 7.Piyush Chandravanshi1.

  8. 8.A(

  9. 9.Prafulla Chandravanshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.(A) (Died And Deleted) Narayan Prasad Shukla Advocate - A.G., ,ANURAG BAJPAI,DHARMESH SRIVASTAVA 1.

  2. 2.Ku. Radhika1.

  3. 3.Vikash Kumar

  4. 4.Bharat

  5. 5.Shatruhan

  6. 6.Bhaktin

  7. 7.Shanti Bai

  8. 8.Arjun Singh

  9. 9.Anusuiya Bai

  10. 10.Purnima

  11. 11.Baisakhin Bai

  12. 12.Kanhaiya Singh

  13. 13.(Died And Deleted) Smt. Shashi Prabha Devi

  14. 14.Smt. Manjari Devi

  15. 15.Smt. Twarika Devi @ Vasundhara

  16. 16.Ashwani Kumar Dubey

  17. 17.Yogeshwarraj Singh

  18. 18.Dhiraj Prasad

  19. 19.Smt. Kaushilya Bai

  20. 20.State Of Chhattisgarh,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed three Second Appeals challenging a judgment regarding disputed land ownership in Kawardha. The Court held that the disputed land originally belonged to Vijay Singh, and the subsequent 1987 mutation in favor of Badra Bai was legally invalid without proper documentation. Since concurrent findings by both lower courts favored the plaintiff (Kanwal Singh's successor), the appellants failed to raise substantial questions of law required for Second Appeal intervention under Section 100 CPC, resulting in dismissal of all appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  16. 31-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  17. 17-Sep-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  19. 12-Aug-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  20. 01-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  21. 01-Jul-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  22. 05-May-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  23. 05-May-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  24. 24-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  25. 24-Apr-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  26. 11-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  27. 11-Apr-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  28. 08-Apr-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  29. 07-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  30. 01-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  31. 01-Apr-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  32. 11-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  33. 11-Mar-2025

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  34. 25-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  35. 17-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  36. 20-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  37. 18-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  38. 01-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  39. 01-Nov-2023

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  40. 26-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  41. 08-Dec-2017

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF

  42. 14-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 30-Jun-2017

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF

  44. 23-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/396/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed three Second Appeals challenging a judgment regarding disputed land ownership in Kawardha. The Court held that the disputed land originally belonged to Vijay Singh, and the subsequent 1987 mutation in favor of Badra Bai was legally invalid without proper documentation. Since concurrent findings by both lower courts favored the plaintiff (Kanwal Singh's successor), the appellants failed to raise substantial questions of law required for Second Appeal intervention under Section 100 CPC, resulting in dismissal of all appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case