G.S. BEDI vs SHRI S. BHARTIDASAN Advocate - A.G. — CONT/393/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010096502026

Filing Number

CONT/5507/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

CONT/393/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.S. BEDI

    Adv. SOMKANT VERMA,MANOJ CHAUHAN,MANOJ CHAUHAN, ,MANOJ CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI S. BHARTIDASAN Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Shri Vijay Daya Ram, Director

    Adv. ABHISHEK CHANDRA GUPTA,AMIYA BHUSHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by G.S. Bedi against S. Bhartidasan and Vijay Daya Ram after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the respondents had complied with the court's previous order dated 23.02.2026. The court accepted the withdrawal of the petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONT/393/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by G.S. Bedi against S. Bhartidasan and Vijay Daya Ram after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the respondents had complied with the court's previous order dated 23.02.2026. The court accepted the withdrawal of the petition and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case