FAGURAM vs (Deleted) Smt. Rajwati Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2132/2021
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010096342021
Filing Number
WPC/5547/2021
Filing Date
24-Mar-2021
Registration No
WPC/2132/2021
Registration Date
09-Apr-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES: 2601 TO 2604 ( 26 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS. ( 2604 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FAGURAM
Adv. ANAND SHUKLA,KHULESH SAHU,KHULESH SAHU, ,Aditya Tiwari,Aditya Tiwari,KHULESH SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.(Deleted) Smt. Rajwati Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Smt. Laxmi Bai
-
3.Smt. Lila Bai
Adv. A.D.KULDEEP,SHUKDEV PRASAD SAHU C.R.Sahu
-
4.Smt. Sharda(Now Major)
-
5.Ved Prakash(Now Major)
-
6.Commissioner
-
7.Collector
-
8.Sub- Divisional Officer
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary - WPC No. 2132/2021 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the matter for four weeks (16/04/2026). Fresh notice was ordered to Respondent No. 2 through regular and speed post due to unsuccessful service at the given address. Respondent No. 3's counsel was granted time to file vakalatnama and collect necessary documents. Any interim relief previously granted shall continue until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
14-Jul-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
05-Jul-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
25-Jun-2021
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
-
11-Jun-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
11-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2132/2021
Case Summary - WPC No. 2132/2021 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the matter for four weeks (16/04/2026). Fresh notice was ordered to Respondent No. 2 through regular and speed post due to unsuccessful service at the given address. Respondent No. 3's counsel was granted time to file vakalatnama and collect necessary documents. Any interim relief previously granted shall continue until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts