DEVESH SUMAN @ NIKKU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SIDDHANT TIWARI,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL — MCRC/2495/2026
Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010096282026
Filing Number
MCRC/4132/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2495/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVESH SUMAN @ NIKKU
Adv. ANUSHKA SHARMA,SWETA MISHRA,SWETA MISHRA, ,DINESH KUMAR YADAV,ISHWAR PRASAD RATHORE,BHASKAR PAYASHI,DIVY JHA,SAMRATH SINGH MARHAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SIDDHANT TIWARI,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL,UMAKANT SINGH CHANDEL
Case History
-
13-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a bail application (MCRC No. 2495/2026) filed by accused Devesh Suman @ Nikku after criticizing it as "bench hunting"—an attempt to avoid a judge who had rejected a related revision petition. The court condemned the conduct and subsequently transferred the case to another appropriate bench. On the final hearing (13.05.2026), after counsels withdrew their vakalatnama, the matter was adjourned for 10 days to allow the State to file objections regarding the applicant's criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2495/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a bail application (MCRC No. 2495/2026) filed by accused Devesh Suman @ Nikku after criticizing it as "bench hunting"—an attempt to avoid a judge who had rejected a related revision petition. The court condemned the conduct and subsequently transferred the case to another appropriate bench. On the final hearing (13.05.2026), after counsels withdrew their vakalatnama, the matter was adjourned for 10 days to allow the State to file objections regarding the applicant's criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts