GOPAL PRASAD BIND vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/298/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010095752026

Filing Number

WA/5456/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

WA/298/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL PRASAD BIND

    Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,SANDEEP SINGH,SANDEEP SINGH, ,RUPESH SAHU,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,waquar naiyer,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee

  3. 3.Registrar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court Division Bench dismissed the appellant's appeal on grounds of maintainability, holding that the Single Judge's order rejecting an amendment application in the writ petition was interlocutory in nature and therefore barred from appeal under Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. The Court, however, requested the Single Judge to decide the underlying writ petition expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court Division Bench dismissed the appellant's appeal on grounds of maintainability, holding that the Single Judge's order rejecting an amendment application in the writ petition was interlocutory in nature and therefore barred from appeal under Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006. The Court, however, requested the Single Judge to decide the underlying writ petition expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case