KHOLBAHRA SMT. RENU KOCHAR, ,LEEKESH KUMAR,AVISHEK BHARTI,RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1335/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010095082026

Filing Number

WPC/5416/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1335/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHOLBAHRA SMT. RENU KOCHAR, ,LEEKESH KUMAR,AVISHEK BHARTI,RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR

  2. 2.Lila Ram

  3. 3.Sahorik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector, Bilaspur

  3. 3.The Sub-Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tehsildar

  5. 5.Boharic

  6. 6.Nanha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed an injunction order passed by the Additional Tahsildar restraining petitioners from constructing on their land, holding that revenue courts lack jurisdiction to issue injunction orders in private civil disputes, particularly title disputes. The court found the dispute between the petitioners and respondent over land ownership was civil in nature and therefore fell exclusively under civil court jurisdiction, not revenue authority jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1335/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed an injunction order passed by the Additional Tahsildar restraining petitioners from constructing on their land, holding that revenue courts lack jurisdiction to issue injunction orders in private civil disputes, particularly title disputes. The court found the dispute between the petitioners and respondent over land ownership was civil in nature and therefore fell exclusively under civil court jurisdiction, not revenue authority jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case