KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPC/1420/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010094992026

Filing Number

WPC/5411/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPC/1420/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. Amit Buxy,MOULIK SHRIVASTAVA,MOULIK SHRIVASTAVA, ,POONAM GILURKAR,MOULIK SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.National Cyber Crime Reportingportal

  3. 3.Reserve Bank of India

  4. 4.Federal Bank

  5. 5.Equitas Small Finance Bank

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Case Summary WPC No. 1420 of 2026 | High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur The case was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents No. 4 & 5 (upon payment of process fee within one week), while notice to respondents No. 1 & 2 was dispensed with. The petitioner's counsel was directed to verify the petitioner's bank accounts and documents, particularly discrepancies in the typed copies showing different bank accounts. The case will be listed immediately after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1420/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary WPC No. 1420 of 2026 | High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur The case was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents No. 4 & 5 (upon payment of process fee within one week), while notice to respondents No. 1 & 2 was dispensed with. The petitioner's counsel was directed to verify the petitioner's bank accounts and documents, particularly discrepancies in the typed copies showing different bank accounts. The case will be listed immediately after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case