RAJU GUPTA @ LADDU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — MCRC/2493/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010094242026

Filing Number

MCRC/4045/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2493/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU GUPTA @ LADDU

    Adv. NAVNEET KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV, ,AKATH KUMAR YADAV,KUSUM LALCHANDANI,KUSUM LALCHANDANI,NIKHIL KUMAR SAHU,Arti Pritam Yadav,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the third bail application of Raju Gupta, accused of rape and POCSO violations, finding sufficient material on record against him despite his claims of false implication and CCTV evidence of his whereabouts. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings and conclude the trial within five months, considering the applicant has been in custody since April 2025 with only 6 of 22 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2493/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the third bail application of Raju Gupta, accused of rape and POCSO violations, finding sufficient material on record against him despite his claims of false implication and CCTV evidence of his whereabouts. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings and conclude the trial within five months, considering the applicant has been in custody since April 2025 with only 6 of 22 witnesses examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case