AJAY RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2289/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010094072026

Filing Number

MCRC/4038/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2289/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY RATRE

    Adv. RAJENDRA TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Ajay Ratre, arrested for illegal liquor possession under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act (Sections 34(2) and 59(A)), considering his lengthy detention since January 28, 2026, and the fact that his previous three similar convictions resulted in acquittals. The Court imposed strict bail conditions including mandatory personal appearance, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and penalties for violation including proceedings under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Ajay Ratre, arrested for illegal liquor possession under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act (Sections 34(2) and 59(A)), considering his lengthy detention since January 28, 2026, and the fact that his previous three similar convictions resulted in acquittals. The Court imposed strict bail conditions including mandatory personal appearance, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and penalties for violation including proceedings under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case