SMT. SUJATA SATAPATHY vs NALINIKANT BISWAL Advocate - MALAY SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA,KAJAL CHANDRA,RICHA PATEL,ANU MISHRA — FA(MAT)/85/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010093122026
Filing Number
FA(MAT)/5331/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
FA(MAT)/85/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
FAMILY LAW MATTERS ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHER DIVORCE MATTERS. ( 1502 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SUJATA SATAPATHY
Adv. AKANKSHA JAIN,Anuradha Jain,Anuradha Jain, ,RAJENDRA JAIN,Anuradha Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.NALINIKANT BISWAL Advocate - MALAY SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA,KAJAL CHANDRA,RICHA PATEL,ANU MISHRA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Case Summary: FA(MAT) No. 85/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the appeal by Smt. Sujata Satapathy against Nalinikant Biswal on 08/05/2026. The court, on the joint prayer of counsel for both parties, adjourned the matter and posted it along with FA(MAT) No. 86/2026 for further hearing. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. FA(MAT)/85/2026
Case Summary: FA(MAT) No. 85/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the appeal by Smt. Sujata Satapathy against Nalinikant Biswal on 08/05/2026. The court, on the joint prayer of counsel for both parties, adjourned the matter and posted it along with FA(MAT) No. 86/2026 for further hearing. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts