M/S RISHI KUMAR @ SONS (HUF) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPT/32/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010090762026

Filing Number

WPT/5206/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPT/32/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

INDIRECT TAXES MATTERS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE TAX ( 412 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RISHI KUMAR @ SONS (HUF)

    Adv. AMIT AGRAWAL,ADITYA AGRAWAL,ADITYA AGRAWAL, ,SOURAV AGRAWAL,ADITYA AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed M/s Rishi Kumar @ Sons' writ petition, holding that an efficacious alternative remedy was available through the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chhattisgarh Bench, which had already begun e-filing. The court declined to entertain the petition as the petitioner failed to exhaust this alternative remedy before approaching the High Court directly, but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal before GSTAT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPT/32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed M/s Rishi Kumar @ Sons' writ petition, holding that an efficacious alternative remedy was available through the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chhattisgarh Bench, which had already begun e-filing. The court declined to entertain the petition as the petitioner failed to exhaust this alternative remedy before approaching the High Court directly, but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal before GSTAT. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case