RAVI KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2251/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010090282026

Filing Number

MCRC/3851/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2251/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. RUSTAM SAHU,ANJU VERMA,ANJU VERMA, ,KHUSHBU SAHU,C.R.Sahu,ANJU VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ravi Kumar Yadav, who was arrested for possessing 32.4 liters of liquor in violation of Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered his lack of criminal antecedents, the filing of the chargesheet, and his prolonged detention since January 25, 2026, and found him entitled to bail with stringent conditions including personal appearance on fixed dates, no adjournment-seeking without witnesses, and restrictions on misusing bail liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ravi Kumar Yadav, who was arrested for possessing 32.4 liters of liquor in violation of Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered his lack of criminal antecedents, the filing of the chargesheet, and his prolonged detention since January 25, 2026, and found him entitled to bail with stringent conditions including personal appearance on fixed dates, no adjournment-seeking without witnesses, and restrictions on misusing bail liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case