VINOD KUMAR VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/303/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010090182026

Filing Number

WA/5173/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

WA/303/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. DEVASHISH TIWARI,Shiv SewaK Manjhi,Shiv SewaK Manjhi, ,DINESH YADAV,Deepak Kaushik,Shiv SewaK Manjhi

  2. 2.Giteshwar Sahu

  3. 3.Arunika Ramteke

  4. 4.Gayatri Verma

  5. 5.Dhaniram Sahu

  6. 6.Chhagan Lal Sahu

  7. 7.Kumari Verma

  8. 8.Netram Verma

  9. 9.Ranjit Kumar Nishad

  10. 10.Santosh Kumar Yadav

  11. 11.Devcharan Nishad

  12. 12.Suresh Kumar Narang

  13. 13.Dharmendra Banjare

  14. 14.Shrikant Gaikwad

  15. 15.Manoj Kumar Ghritalahare

  16. 16.Santoshi Yadav

  17. 17.Santosh Singh Verma

  18. 18.Pawan Tiwari

  19. 19.Jagmohan Sahu

  20. 20.Bhupendra Kumar Dhruw

  21. 21.Lata Sahu

  22. 22.Rekha Rajak

  23. 23.Khilawan Das Mirchande

  24. 24.Kamini Mandavi

  25. 25.Aditya Verma

  26. 26.Khushboo Vaishnav

  27. 27.Archana Jha

  28. 28.Vasudev Tandon

  29. 29.Kajal Dubey

  30. 30.Raj Kumar Sonwani

  31. 31.Babli Vaishnav

  32. 32.Sumeshwar Kumar Sahu

  33. 33.Kailash Kumar Sahu

  34. 34.Ramkumar Sahu

  35. 35.Hemnarayan Dewangan

  36. 36.Jhamita Deshmukh

  37. 37.Rajeev Kumar Bhuwal

  38. 38.Roopa Rajput

  39. 39.Shyanu Gupta

  40. 40.Vishwaprabha Chandrvanshi

  41. 41.Manisha Kaushal

  42. 42.Jaleshwar Das Manikpuri

  43. 43.Prakash Ware

  44. 44.Damman Singh Sahu

  45. 45.Vishnu Prakash Sahu

  46. 46.Tikeshwar Kumar Sahu

  47. 47.Madan Lal Dhruw

  48. 48.Mukesh Kumar Taram

  49. 49.Manju Devi Gupta

  50. 50.Rashmi Soni

  51. 51.Kamal Kant Dhruw

  52. 52.Gavkaran Dhruw

  53. 53.Devkumar Dhruw

  54. 54.Devkumari Padoti

  55. 55.Namita Sinha

  56. 56.Kesho Ram Sahu

  57. 57.Prakash Singh Rawte

  58. 58.Jyoti Gumbar

  59. 59.Anita Ratre

  60. 60.Jiwan Lal Dahariya

  61. 61.Tibhan Das

  62. 62.Yashomati Dongre

  63. 63.Arjun Kumar Soni

  64. 64.Umend Prasad Baghel

  65. 65.Rajkumar Jaiswal

  66. 66.Bhawana Chandrakar

  67. 67.Rakesh Dhruw

  68. 68.Dewsingh Mandavi

  69. 69.Abhay Singh Rathaur

  70. 70.Dumman Singh Sahu

  71. 71.Bhupendra Kumar Mandle

  72. 72.Neha Sonkar

  73. 73.Naresh Kumar Verma

  74. 74.Geetesh Mishra

  75. 75.Gaind Lal Deshlahare

  76. 76.Vinod Kumar Banjare

  77. 77.Rohit Kumar Chaturvedi

  78. 78.Birendra Kumar Gaikwad

  79. 79.Rikhi Ram Chandrakar

  80. 80.Peela Das Banjare

  81. 81.Hitesh Kumar Mahant

  82. 82.Tikendra Kumar Sahu

  83. 83.Digvijay Kumar Ghritlahare

  84. 84.Loknath Gendre

  85. 85.Anju Barmate

  86. 86.Ajeet Kumar Baghel

  87. 87.Manish Verma

  88. 88.Mukesh Kumar Miri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Commissioner cum Director

  5. 5.District Education Officer

  6. 6.Chief Executive Officer

  7. 7.Chief Executive Officer

  8. 8.Block Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ appeal by 88 teachers (appointed as Shiksha Karmi under the Panchayat Department between 2008-2013) seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (promotion pay scale) benefits under the March 10, 2017 Government Circular. The Court held that the circular applies only to State Government employees, not Panchayat cadre employees, and therefore the petitioners—who were not State employees until their absorption in 2018—cannot claim these benefits. The decision was based on the established distinction between Panchayat and School Education Department employees and consistent precedent in five prior judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ appeal by 88 teachers (appointed as Shiksha Karmi under the Panchayat Department between 2008-2013) seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (promotion pay scale) benefits under the March 10, 2017 Government Circular. The Court held that the circular applies only to State Government employees, not Panchayat cadre employees, and therefore the petitioners—who were not State employees until their absorption in 2018—cannot claim these benefits. The decision was based on the established distinction between Panchayat and School Education Department employees and consistent precedent in five prior judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case