GITESHWARI SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/377/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010090052026

Filing Number

WA/5164/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

WA/377/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GITESHWARI SAHU

    Adv. DEVASHISH TIWARI,Shiv SewaK Manjhi,Shiv SewaK Manjhi, ,DINESH YADAV,Deepak Kaushik,Shiv SewaK Manjhi

  2. 2.Dharmendra Kumar Rao

  3. 3.Bhupendra Dhruw

  4. 4.Priti Dewangan

  5. 5.Shailendra Kashyap

  6. 6.Santram Sahu

  7. 7.Rohit Kumar

  8. 8.Khilendra Singh Thakur

  9. 9.Manish Kumar Markam

  10. 10.Santosh Das Koshle

  11. 11.Sewati Dhruv

  12. 12.Kavita Bai Patel

  13. 13.Omprakash Sahu

  14. 14.Pratibha Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State Of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.Director,

  4. 4.Director

  5. 5.District Education Officer,

  6. 6.Chief Executive Officer,

  7. 7.Chief Executive Officer,

  8. 8.Chief Executive Officer,

  9. 9.Chief Executive Officer,

  10. 10.Block Education Officer,

  11. 11.Chief Executive Officer,

  12. 12.Block Executive Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appeal of 14 assistant teachers seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (promotional pay benefits) under the 2017 circular. The court held that the circular applies only to State Government employees, not Panchayat-cadre Shiksha Karmi teachers, whose services prior to 2018 absorption were governed by Panchayat rules and cannot claim equivalent benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the appeal of 14 assistant teachers seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (promotional pay benefits) under the 2017 circular. The court held that the circular applies only to State Government employees, not Panchayat-cadre Shiksha Karmi teachers, whose services prior to 2018 absorption were governed by Panchayat rules and cannot claim equivalent benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case