SANJAY KUMAR VERMA vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/631/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010089762026
Filing Number
CRA/3829/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRA/631/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL UNDER NIA ACT ( 1448 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY KUMAR VERMA
Adv. Mrs. SHITAL SONI,SURAJ KUMAR AUDHELIYA,SURAJ KUMAR AUDHELIYA, ,VIJYITA SAHU,VIJYITA SAHU,VIJYITA SAHU,VIJYITA SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Sanjay Kumar Verma's bail appeal in a human trafficking and child sexual abuse case. The court upheld the Special Judge's rejection of bail, finding the victim specifically named the appellant in her statements and depositions, the charges of trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor are grave, and the trial is near completion with only one witness remaining. The court distinguished his case from a similarly situated co-accused who was granted bail, noting the appellant was named from investigation's inception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/631/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Sanjay Kumar Verma's bail appeal in a human trafficking and child sexual abuse case. The court upheld the Special Judge's rejection of bail, finding the victim specifically named the appellant in her statements and depositions, the charges of trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor are grave, and the trial is near completion with only one witness remaining. The court distinguished his case from a similarly situated co-accused who was granted bail, noting the appellant was named from investigation's inception. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts