CHHOTU KHAN @ AASHIF KHAN MOMIN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2290/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010089582026

Filing Number

MCRC/3816/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2290/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTU KHAN @ AASHIF KHAN MOMIN

    Adv. Deepali Gupta,DIWESH KUMAR,DIWESH KUMAR, ,DIWESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Chhotu Khan, who was arrested in connection with a ₹85,000 robbery case. The court found that despite serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, the prosecution lacked direct evidence, no recovery was made from the applicant, and there was an unexplained two-month delay in his implication. Given the applicant's clean criminal record and the likelihood of a prolonged trial, the court deemed continued custody unwarranted and released him on bail with conditions including personal bond, two sureties, and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2290/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Chhotu Khan, who was arrested in connection with a ₹85,000 robbery case. The court found that despite serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act, the prosecution lacked direct evidence, no recovery was made from the applicant, and there was an unexplained two-month delay in his implication. Given the applicant's clean criminal record and the likelihood of a prolonged trial, the court deemed continued custody unwarranted and released him on bail with conditions including personal bond, two sureties, and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case