Rampyare Gupta ajay kumar mishra vs State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G. — CRA/610/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010089392026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
CRA/3811/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRA/610/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
ADHINIYAM, 1990.MATTERS RELATING TO SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989;UNTOUCHABILITY (OFFENCES) AMENDMENT & MISC. PROVISION ACT, 1976. ( 1419 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rampyare Gupta ajay kumar mishra
-
2.Sunil Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Chhattisgarh Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed six criminal appeals and granted regular bail to the accused appellants charged under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, finding that witness evidence (PW-4 to PW-6) established a land dispute where the complainant attempted to encroach upon the appellants' land, demonstrating a substantial change in circumstances warranting bail. The court set aside the trial court's bail rejection orders and released the appellants on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/610/2026
Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed six criminal appeals and granted regular bail to the accused appellants charged under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, finding that witness evidence (PW-4 to PW-6) established a land dispute where the complainant attempted to encroach upon the appellants' land, demonstrating a substantial change in circumstances warranting bail. The court set aside the trial court's bail rejection orders and released the appellants on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts