GOPAL KRISHNA MISHRA vs ONKAR NATH MISHRA Advocate - A.G., ,AMRITO DAS,K. Rohan,Abhyuday Singh,P. Acharya,P. Acharya,abhishek k singh — MA/30/2019
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010088482019
Filing Number
MA/5089/2019
Filing Date
08-Mar-2019
Registration No
MA/30/2019
Registration Date
14-Mar-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 43 RULE 1 C.P.C. ( 1727 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL KRISHNA MISHRA
Adv. A.N.PANDEY
-
2.Radha Krishna Mishra
-
3.Vivekanand Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.ONKAR NATH MISHRA Advocate - A.G., ,AMRITO DAS,K. Rohan,Abhyuday Singh,P. Acharya,P. Acharya,abhishek k singh
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh heard MA No. 30 of 2019 (Gopal Krishna Mishra v. Onkar Nath Mishra) across multiple dates. In the latest order dated 13.04.2026, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks after noting that respondent No. 1 has died during the pendency of the appeal and the appellant's counsel requested time to file an appropriate application. Earlier orders had issued notices and fixed timelines for considering the application on admission and related interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Sep-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar GuptaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
18-Mar-2019
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
08-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MA/30/2019
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh heard MA No. 30 of 2019 (Gopal Krishna Mishra v. Onkar Nath Mishra) across multiple dates. In the latest order dated 13.04.2026, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks after noting that respondent No. 1 has died during the pendency of the appeal and the appellant's counsel requested time to file an appropriate application. Earlier orders had issued notices and fixed timelines for considering the application on admission and related interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts