MOHD. SURFARAJ vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/365/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010085642026

Filing Number

MCRCA/3654/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/365/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. SURFARAJ

    Adv. Sachin Nidhi,MD. ZAKIR ANAM SHAH,MD. ZAKIR ANAM SHAH, ,ANJAY MISHRA,SAMEER RIGRI,AISHWARY DIWAN,AISHWARY DIWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohd. Surfaraj in a case involving allegations under Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that both the applicant and the victim (a major) were in a consensual relationship, and the FIR was lodged only after the relationship failed to culminate in marriage, indicating the case lacked merit. The applicant was released on personal bond and surety subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Mohd. Surfaraj in a case involving allegations under Section 69 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that both the applicant and the victim (a major) were in a consensual relationship, and the FIR was lodged only after the relationship failed to culminate in marriage, indicating the case lacked merit. The applicant was released on personal bond and surety subject to specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case