STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs GURUVINDER SINGH SANDHU — CRA/645/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010085022026

Filing Number

CRA/3647/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRA/645/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURUVINDER SINGH SANDHU

  2. 2.Vikash Bharti,

  3. 3.Vinay Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA/645/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's criminal appeal for failure to file within the limitation period. The court rejected the State's application for condonation of a 339-day delay, finding no sufficient cause and holding that routine bureaucratic procedures cannot excuse inordinate delays—the law of limitation binds government equally with private parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/645/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA/645/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the State's criminal appeal for failure to file within the limitation period. The court rejected the State's application for condonation of a 339-day delay, finding no sufficient cause and holding that routine bureaucratic procedures cannot excuse inordinate delays—the law of limitation binds government equally with private parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case