RAJESH KUMAR RAJ vs SUBHASH CHANDRA NAIDU — MAC/504/2024
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010084712024
Filing Number
MAC/5018/2024
Filing Date
07-Mar-2024
Registration No
MAC/504/2024
Registration Date
12-Mar-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR RAJ
Adv. OM PRAKASH SAHU,PANKAJ SAHU,PANKAJ SAHU, ,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASH CHANDRA NAIDU
Adv. KAWARPAL SINGH GANDHI 1123
-
2.SOURABH SINGH
-
3.BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. VAIBHAV SHUKLA,PRAGATI PANDEY UJJWAL CHOUBEY ASTHA SHUKLA SHREJAL GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: MAC/504/2024 The National Lok Adalat of Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Rajesh Kumar Raj's motor accident claim against the vehicle owner, driver, and Efco Tokyo Insurance Company by approving a compromise settlement. The insurance company agreed to pay an additional Rs. 25,000 within two months, with the settlement conditions and previous Claims Tribunal orders remaining valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
14-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
-
14-Mar-2024
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
-
07-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/504/2024
Case Summary: MAC/504/2024 The National Lok Adalat of Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Rajesh Kumar Raj's motor accident claim against the vehicle owner, driver, and Efco Tokyo Insurance Company by approving a compromise settlement. The insurance company agreed to pay an additional Rs. 25,000 within two months, with the settlement conditions and previous Claims Tribunal orders remaining valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts