SMT. SHANTI PANDEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2036/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010084672021

Filing Number

WPS/4905/2021

Filing Date

12-Mar-2021

Registration No

WPS/2036/2021

Registration Date

20-Mar-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SHANTI PANDEY

    Adv. PRAFULL N.BHARAT,AKASH PANDEY,AKASH PANDEY, ,KESHAV DEWANGAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR,AKASH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Chief Engineer

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer

  5. 5.Shri P.K. Janvade

    Adv. HARSH WARDHAN,SHASHI BARETH K.K. TIWARI

  6. 6.Lipika Biswas

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition (WPS No. 2036/2021) filed by Smt. Shanti Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh and others as infructuous because the petitioner passed away during the pendency of the case. Since the petitioner's death rendered the relief sought no longer viable, the court found it appropriate to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jun-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  4. 24-Mar-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2036/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition (WPS No. 2036/2021) filed by Smt. Shanti Pandey against the State of Chhattisgarh and others as infructuous because the petitioner passed away during the pendency of the case. Since the petitioner's death rendered the relief sought no longer viable, the court found it appropriate to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case